Toolbox
- size +

Make Ethanol in Your Own Backyard

by Lisa Zyga
E-Fuel says the MicroFueler could produce ethanol for less than a dollar per gallon.
E-Fuel says the MicroFueler could produce ethanol for less than a dollar per gallon.

A Silicon Valley start-up called E-Fuel is showing exactly how ethanol can live up to its name as "the people´s fuel." The company recently announced that it will soon start selling a home ethanol system, the E-Fuel 100 MicoFueler, which will allow anyone to make ethanol from sugar, water, yeast, and electricity in their own backyard.
The MicroFueler, which is about the size of a gas station pump, will sell for $9,995 and start shipping late in 2008. E-Fuel´s founders Floyd Butterfield and Thomas Quinn expect that government incentives for alternative fuels will reduce the initial investment by up to $5,000.

The MicroFueler uses sugar as the main fuel source, which is mixed with a time-release yeast the company has developed. E-Fuel explains that it takes about 10-14 pounds of sugar to make one gallon of ethanol. When using store-bought sugar, which costs about 20 cents per pound in the US, plus the cost of electricity, the cost to produce a gallon of ethanol would be roughly equivalent to today´s gas prices in the US.

However, Butterfield and Quinn note that inedible sugar can be bought from Mexico for about 2.5 cents per pound under the North American Free Trade Agreement effective this past January. Then it could cost as little as a dollar a gallon to produce ethanol with the MicroFueler. Quinn also noted that he´s used leftover alcohol as an alternative feedstock to sugar, and the only cost is for the electricity.

"It´s going to cause havoc in the market and cause great financial stress in the oil industry," Quinn told The New York Times.

Previously, distilling ethanol has required large pieces of equipment and questionable efficiency. But E-Fuel says that it has developed technology such as a new membrane distiller that can separate water from alcohol at lower temperatures than in conventional ethanol refining, reducing cost and complexity. The machine can fill its 35-gallon tank through fermentation in about a week, it doesn´t produce odors, and the water byproduct is potable. Further, the company estimates that burning a gallon of ethanol made by the MicroFueler will let off just 12% of the carbon that a gallon of gasoline emits.

To brew ethanol at home, property owners in the US must obtain permits from the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. Currently, however, it´s illegal in the US to run a conventional vehicle on 100% ethanol - but E-Fuel is hoping that regulators will certify all-ethanol cars if their system becomes popular.

E-Fuel plans to release the machine internationally, with production in China and the UK, in addition to the US. The company is also working on a commercial version and variations that will use different feedstocks besides sugar.

via: The New York Times and Popular Mechanics
» Next Article in Technology - Energy: Biofuels backlash in US as food costs hit home

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

4 out of 5 after 81 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by nano999 05/09/08 13:19
Rank: 3.33/5 after 6 votes
I have some serious doubts about this.
Posted by Kato77 05/09/08 13:22
Rank: 2.75/5 after 4 votes
I wonder if they remind people to get the appropriate paper work done. Even distilling for fuel requires the proper authorization.
Posted by holoman 05/09/08 13:25
Rank: 3/5 after 5 votes
BIG OIL WILL NEVER ALLOW THIS TO PASS !
Posted by earls 05/09/08 14:15
Rank: 3.75/5 after 4 votes
I'm with nano999, too many loose ends and hidden costs.

I also seem to remember reading an article on the net in the past where they (state or federal government) shut a farmer down from making biofuel because he wasn't paying "gas tax" on it to run his vehicles.
Posted by Amy_Steri 05/09/08 14:22
Rank: 5/5 after 5 votes
Let me get this straight...you only save money if you get the sugar from Mexico, and it takes an average of 12 pounds per gallon. So, if you fill up 2-3 times a month, you'd be shipping nearly 500 pounds of sugar a month. How is this a good idea for the economy or the environment?
Posted by nano999 05/09/08 14:33
Rank: 3.67/5 after 3 votes
Amy_Steri - well said. All that sugar seems absurd to say the least.
Posted by superhuman 05/09/08 15:08
Rank: 3.6/5 after 5 votes
Maybe they hope people will buy it to make cheap booze
Posted by Glis 05/09/08 15:16
Rank: 4.25/5 after 4 votes
Ethanol = Booze.

If you want to make cheap ethanol out of household garbage and chemicals, ask anyone whose done time in a prison. In fact, I would consult them over Si Valley on this matter anyday. For that matter, you could just make booze and sell it to buy gas, become a drunk and never leave the house or quit bitching and buy a smaller car.

ITS A HUGE GOD UGLY BOOZE MACHINE! I picture frats/writers being their target customers. How do you prevent bums from raiding your yard in mass to worship it? Will it provide different flavors, such as MD2020/Cisco?
Posted by 1bigschwantz 05/09/08 15:24
Rank: 4/5 after 2 votes
Glis has a good point!
College kids would probably love this...but almost 10 grand is allot of mac and cheese to give up to save up for one of these.
Posted by marjon 05/09/08 16:38
Rank: 5/5 after 1 vote
How will the state and feds tax the fuel?
Posted by marjon 05/09/08 16:41
Rank: 4.33/5 after 3 votes
The solutions are there. Get the government out of the way!
Posted by zevkirsh 05/09/08 19:17
Rank: 4.67/5 after 3 votes
this might not seem so absurd 50 years from now when your fuel ration will be 2 gallons a week.
i sincerely hope this is not the case though...but it seems like this is what this idea is aimed at. that sort of future.
Posted by Sean_W 05/09/08 20:21
Rank: 4/5 after 4 votes
Labs and other industries use ethanol as a solvent, disinfectant and for other uses so the device might be useful for other reasons. If it can deliver absolute alcohol cheaper (99% is currently significantly more costly than 90 or 95%) it would be very valuable.

As for fuel, a means of producing sugar far more efficiently (in terms of land use, energy efficiency and cost that is) than current agricultural methods would be needed. It would preferably be a method that could be done close to markets - using energy from other sources (renewable, nuclear etc.) to drive chemical reactions might be conceivable but it might just be easier to design better electric cars.
Posted by Vlasev 05/10/08 07:21
Rank: 3.67/5 after 3 votes
I also doubt this "invention" will do any good.
We all know what happened with corn prise since people started using it to produce ethanol.

Haven't we learn something???
Using food as ethanol source does not work in general - rich nations will have their relatively cheaper fuel, poor people will starve because of the consequent and innevitable rise in the prices.
Posted by Corban 05/10/08 10:09
Rank: 5/5 after 2 votes
If this machine distilled ethanol from mowed grass instead of perfectly edible sugar, then it would make more sense. As it stands, you're essentially converting resources without any perceptible change in value. What's its purpose?
Posted by E. L. Earnhardt 05/10/08 10:24
Rank: 5/5 after 3 votes
During WW2 German taxi-cabs towed "smokers" behind their cabs when gas was unavailable. We could do the same!
Posted by SDMike 05/10/08 14:25
Not rated yet.
If you do not run your vehicle on public roads you do not need to pay "road tax". All my neighbors have two tanks. On taxed tank for road fuel, one untaxed tank for on farm consumption (driving a tractor on public roads from field to field is considered "on farm" consumption). Diesel fuel is dyed so inspectors can see untaxed fuel.

If you use LNG in your car you are not required to pay road tax. Why should you pay road tax on alcohol?

PS Sugar can come from many sources including your kitchen waste stream.
Posted by Xig 05/10/08 15:07
Rank: 5/5 after 2 votes
Fancy covered Moonshine Still
Posted by CWFlink 05/10/08 23:48
Rank: 5/5 after 1 vote
There will soon be speculation raising the price of inedible Mexican sugar higher than the price of edible sugar!!! :-)

Obviously they need to make this still run on grass clippings, garbage and (best) BS!

They should be good at this, seeing how much BS they spread in this article!
Posted by ancientone 05/10/08 23:51
Rank: 5/5 after 1 vote
Do you really want to be "importing" all that sugar, investing in the "fueller" and then making make the "booze" fuel.

A much better solution is to make methanol.

Have you looked at the case that Dr. Zubrin makes for making flex-fuel vehicles manadory in the US within 3-5 years... this solution would make the US a non-oil-importing nation... just like Brazil currently is.

Check out Dr Zubrin's video at:
http://tinyurl.com/4s4g7l

Then tell your friends about it;
and write to your congress and try to get them off their butts.
Posted by snwboardn 19 hours ago
Not rated yet.
I thought we would have learned something from the latest headlines about using food for fuel. Sure it sounds good on paper until you multiply 100 pounds of sugar by 30 Mil people every time they want a full tank of ethanol... Doesn't sound promising at all.